<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silent Victory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewklavan.com/2010/01/25/silent-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewklavan.com/2010/01/25/silent-victory/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endivio Roquefort I</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewklavan.com/2010/01/25/silent-victory/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Endivio Roquefort I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewklavan.com/?p=65#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I turn to Google in the hope that my more daring feats of wordplay will prove to be original - they rarely are. It&#039;s actually quite difficult to put three or four English words together in a manner that is both intelligible and utterly original. But that phrase that jumps out of this article at the reader like a scalded cat - I refer, of course, to &quot;the heroism of Bush&quot; - immediately struck me as a possible first-timer. I checked. &quot;heroism of Bush&quot;, in quotes, actually gets four Google hits, but yours is the only one that refers to George W, so I guess that makes it unique. I&#039;ve been looking for a site that says unique things for a long time. I shall be back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I turn to Google in the hope that my more daring feats of wordplay will prove to be original &#8211; they rarely are. It&#8217;s actually quite difficult to put three or four English words together in a manner that is both intelligible and utterly original. But that phrase that jumps out of this article at the reader like a scalded cat &#8211; I refer, of course, to &#8220;the heroism of Bush&#8221; &#8211; immediately struck me as a possible first-timer. I checked. &#8220;heroism of Bush&#8221;, in quotes, actually gets four Google hits, but yours is the only one that refers to George W, so I guess that makes it unique. I&#8217;ve been looking for a site that says unique things for a long time. I shall be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewklavan.com/2010/01/25/silent-victory/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewklavan.com/?p=65#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Pity they can&#039;t come home to America and fight our REAL enemies!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity they can&#8217;t come home to America and fight our REAL enemies!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWH</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewklavan.com/2010/01/25/silent-victory/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>DWH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewklavan.com/?p=65#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Yes the NYT&#039;S hates Bushes war in Iraq, and could not report on the marines withdrawal from this fight, because they are being shipped to the war two countries to the east that our current commander in chief has esculated, even though he promised to end both wars to get elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the NYT&#8217;S hates Bushes war in Iraq, and could not report on the marines withdrawal from this fight, because they are being shipped to the war two countries to the east that our current commander in chief has esculated, even though he promised to end both wars to get elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

